The Peninsula Foundation

Tag: Oceans

Most of the world’s ocean is unprotected: This is why that needs to change
- More than three billion people rely on the ocean for their livelihoods, most of them in developing countries.
- Only 7% of the world’s ocean, a vital resource for fighting climate change, is under any protection, and just 3% is highly protected.
- The ‘Blue Leaders’ campaign urges countries to join international treaties that would protect the ocean and all the benefits it provides to humanity.
The ocean is a vital life support system for the planet, and we are running out of time to preserve the marine biodiversity that it is home to and upon which we all depend.

Having played a key role thus far in the mitigation of climate change, our blue ally is quickly running out of steam. With water temperature and sea levels rising, acidification, pollution, unsustainable exploitation of marine resources, depletion of fish stocks, the near disappearance of coral reefs, and the destruction of fragile ecosystems, the ocean is being disproportionately impacted by human activities.

Now, more than ever, we must consider the possible implications of its demise.

The ocean plays an indispensable role in providing and regulating resources that are vital to sustaining life on Earth — from rainwater to drinking water, and as a source of our food, weather, and the oxygen we breathe

Securing our ocean’s future

Recognizing the key role that the ocean plays for people all over the world, the United Nations has adopted a sustainable development goal focused on conserving the ocean, with targets for action on an array of problems. While some progress has been made, more is yet needed to secure our ocean’s future.

Scientists have called for securing at least 30% of marine waters as fully or highly protected sanctuaries, free from damaging human activities like bottom trawl fishing and seabed mining. By doing so, we can give the ocean a fighting chance in the face of climate change.

Today, just 7% of the world’s ocean is under protection, and only 3% is highly protected. Moreover, there is no legal mechanism in place to establish fully protected marine areas in the high seas and deep seabed areas, our shared international waters that constitute nearly two thirds of the global ocean.

Marine coastlines are home to 2.4 billion people — approximately 40% of the world’s population. More than three billion people rely on the ocean for their livelihoods, most of them in developing countries. Degradation of coastal and marine ecosystems threatens the physical, economic, and food security of communities around the world.

Continuing along our current path towards ocean destruction will impact human lives and livelihoods.

The role of the ocean and coastal and marine ecosystems in climate change mitigation is often overlooked. Protecting and restoring ocean habitats such as seagrass beds, salt marshes, and mangroves, and their associated food webs, can sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at rates up to five times greater than tropical forests.

Choosing not to prioritize the protection of our ocean is depriving us of the tools we desperately need to achieve our climate mitigation goals.

Commitments are needed

With multiple high-level ocean negotiations planned in 2022, this year is one filled with opportunity for the preservation of our oceans. Our only hope for a better future lies in the adoption of unprecedentedly bold ocean conservation commitments.

The science is clear: to maximize the health and resilience of the global ocean, at least 30% of it must be protected through a network of “highly” and “fully” protected Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) by 2030.

To achieve this goal, a new treaty for the conservation and management of marine life in the high seas must be concluded to ensure that human activities are managed to prevent significant adverse impacts, with robust oversight mechanisms and provisions to establish fully protected MPAs in the high seas.

Governments who have joined the “Blue Leaders” campaign call on all countries to rally behind these commitments at the upcoming meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CoP15), expected to take place in Kunming, China in August 2022.

Another key moment is the UN Ocean Conference, which is scheduled to be held in Lisbon, Portugal, from 27 June to 1 July. Each of these meetings offers an opportunity for countries to come together, join the Blue Leaders, and take the action that our ocean desperately needs.

The ocean knows no boundaries: it unites us all as a physical link between coastal countries, communities, and individuals, and as the source of our food, water, and air. We all face similar challenges and similar opportunities. Let us be bold for the ocean together.

Feature Image: pewtrusts.org

This article was published earlier in weforum.org and is republished under the Creative Commons 4.0 International Public License.
January 7, 2023
Environmental Impacts of the Belt And Road Initiative

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), initially known as One Belt One Road (OBOR), was first announced in 2013 by President Xi Jinping. It aims to interconnect Asia, Europe, and Africa through two interlinked projects: the Belt as the land route, and the Road as the maritime route. The BRI aims to contribute significantly to overall economic or monetary development, as well as in the power generation area, it can further develop energy access and unwavering reliability in regions with quickly developing energy demand. Nonetheless, the BRI’s financial advantages and development of power frameworks might come at the cost of significant environmental degradation. The sheer size of the BRI has ignited increasing global concerns about the potential environmental damage. These concerns include ecologically sensitive areas, concern about the large amounts of raw materials needed, and locking in of various environmentally detrimental forms of infrastructure, for example, non-renewable energy (fossil fuel) related framework.

The BRI projects are instrumental in meeting the global CO2 emission targets; if all the BRI member states fail to reach the CO2 emission targets, that would result in a 2.7° C increase in the average global temperature.

There are numerous BRI projects which would pass through ecologically sensitive areas, thus compromising on such fragile regions. Some have even described BRI as the “riskiest environmental project in history”. The BRI has far-reaching influence, and it is estimated that the BRI investments are impacting over 60 per cent of the global population. The BRI projects are instrumental in meeting the global CO2 emission targets; if all the BRI member states fail to reach the CO2 emission targets, that would result in a 2.7° C increase in the average global temperature.

Securing and protecting the environment while encouraging financial advancement under the BRI will be extremely difficult and challenging, as the initiative crosses a different scope of fragile and delicate environments. Biophysical conditions range from woods and steppes in Russia; to ice, snow, and permafrost across the Tibetan Plateau; and tropical rainforests in Malaysia. Observers are worried about the natural threat that the BRI presents. Infrastructure advancement, trade, and investment ventures under the BRI could bring negative ecological impacts that might offset its economic gains. The possible effects of the BRI are complex and manifold. Foundation projects affect biological systems and wildlife, yet in addition aberrant impacts like logging, poaching, and settlement, adding to deforestation and other land related changes. The BRI could result in biodiversity loss because of fragmentation and debasement of various habitats, and cause increment in greenhouse gas emission due to the development and upkeep of transportation infrastructures and further Chinese interest in coal-terminated power plants. It could likewise speed up extraction of natural resources, like water, sand, and ferrous metal minerals and ores in nations along the BRI.

One such danger from BRI is the Russia–China Amur Bridge transport corridor, which takes apart two nature reserves with old growth forests. BRI framework will influence practically all of Eurasia’s biggest stream frameworks. Also, numerous BRI courses, for example the Karakoram Highway, go through geo-dynamically active regions. The Karakoram Highway linking the Xinjiang province in China to Gwadar Port in Pakistan, goes through Himalayan areas known for “extremely high geodynamic action” like seismic tremors, avalanches, frigid disintegration and erratic storms, but alternative pathways are even worse. In the Aral Sea, Central Asia, combined effects from the socio-ecological communications between misadministration, over-water system and serious contamination causing water shortage are amplified by truly dysfunctional transboundary management which can possibly result in armed conflicts. Heavily polluting Chinese concrete plants migrating to Tajikistan has been referred to as one illustration of this. Also, a logging ban in China’s Heilongjiang area caused spill-over impacts for forests overseas. Additionally, trade changes methods of production and utilization, changing income and along these lines contamination levels. As indicated by the Kuznets curve, pollution increments at first as income develops, yet over a defining moment, contamination falls as higher earnings bring innovative upgrades and expanding interest for ecological conveniences. Financial development might build the modern contamination base, known as scale effects. Negative scale effects and positive effects for the climate are hard to separate observationally, and quantitative examinations differ on whether the scale or procedure impact is bigger. Various toxins likewise respond diversely to exchange related changes. For instance, a Chinese report joining scale and method effects proposed that trade expanded SO2, and dust fall, however, decreased substance oxygen interest, arsenic and cadmium.

Arranging and resolving natural issues related with the BRI is colossally complex and multi-scaled. Understanding the attributes of the effects of BRI on the environment is the initial step for conceiving strategy and plans for addressing its effects on guaranteed sustainable development. The main mechanism to achieve the sustainability objectives of the BRI is cooperation, “characterized by governance guidance, business commitment, and social participation”. In any case, environmental governance accompanies different difficulties, first, BRI specific and related approaches are not unyielding, but rather dependent on intentional and corporate self-administrative instruments. China’s vision of a “green BRI” is probably not going to be acknowledged without any stricter approaches that set out concrete and substantial set of activities. Second challenge, for the environmental governance of the BRI is to address tele couplings.

The Chinese government is taking a functioning, yet delicate way to deal with the environmental governance of the BRI. China utilizes the BRI as a stage to introduce itself as the rule-maker/rule-taker in global ecological administration as it further mobilizes existing environmental governance organisations and assembles new ones. Be that as it may, the environmental stability of the BRI doesn’t just rely on the environmental governance endeavours of Chinese actors, however, strikingly on the implementation, checking, and authorization of environmental laws and guidelines in BRI host nations. Finally, and most importantly the most significant errand for future research is to exactly explore whether environmental standards or norms be subject to California or Shanghai effects.

References

Callahan, William A. China dreams: 20 visions of China’s future Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 1

Adolph, C., Quince, V., & Prakash, A. (2017). The Shanghai effect: Do exports to China affect labor practices in Africa? World Development, 89, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.0091

Andrews-Speed, P., & Zhang, S. (2018). China as a low-carbon energy leader: Successes and limitations. Journal of Asian Energy Studies, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24112/jaes.02010123

Abbott, K. W. (2017). Orchestration: Strategic ordering in polycentric climate governance. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. Van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change (pp. 188–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.01221

Cefic 2011 Cefic (2011) Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission from Freight Transport Operations, http://www.cefic.org/Documents/RESOURCES/Guidelines/Transport-and-Logistics/Best%20Practice%20Guidelines%20-%20General%20Guidelines/Cefic-ECTA%20Guidelines%20for%20measuring%20and%20managing%20CO2%20emissions%20from%20transport%20operations%20Final%2030.03.2011.pdf?epslanguage=eni

Randrianarisoa, Laingo M., Anming Zhang, Hangjun Yang, Andrew Yuen, and Waiman Cheung. “How ‘belt’and ‘road’are related economically: modelling and policy implications.” Maritime Policy & Management 48, no. 3 (2021): 432-460.

Cockburn , Henry. “China’s $8 Trillion ‘Silk Road’ Construction Programme ‘Riskiest Environmental Project in History’.” The Independent. Independent Digital News and Media, May 20, 2018. https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/china-belt-and-road-initiative-silk-route-cost-environment-damage-a8354256.html.

“Decarbonizing the Belt and Road Initiative: A Green Finance Roadmap.” Vivid Economics. Accessed October 1, 2021. https://www.vivideconomics.com/casestudy/decarbonizing-the-belt-and-road-initiative-a-green-finance-roadmap/.

Ascensão, F.; Fahrig, L.; Clevenger, A.P.; Corlett, R.T.; Jaeger, J.A.G.; Laurance, W.F.; Pereira, H.M. Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 206–209.

Teo, Hoong C., Alex M. Lechner, Grant W. Walton, Faith K.S. Chan, Ali Cheshmehzangi, May Tan-Mullins, Hing K. Chan, Troy Sternberg, and Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz. 2019. “Environmental Impacts of Infrastructure Development under the Belt and Road Initiative” Environments 6, no. 6: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6060072

Feature Image Credit: USC US-China Institute

Map Credit: Brookings Institution

October 26, 2021
Blue Economy: A Prospective Strategy For Sustainable Economy

Oceans, seas and coastal areas are the world’s largest ecosystems. They play a vital role in the food security and livelihood of billions of people all around the globe and contribute to the economic prosperity of many countries. Marine environments are able to provide jobs as well as nutrition, but increased human and economic interventions due to uncoordinated and not poorly researched development policies can pressurize and threaten the environment in the long-term. The United Nations Conference on sustainable development held in Rio de Janeiro in 2012 coined the concept of Blue Economy, defining the concept as a distinction between socio-economic development and environmental damages, which is the traditional view of global status quo. The concept is aligned with main stream economic activities in the marine and coastal ecosystems while incorporating the need to integrate the conservation and sustainable management of these ecosystems. These include the lowering of greenhouse gases emissions during consumption. A sustainable blue economy is basically a marine/ocean-based economy that contributes to food security, eradication of poverty, employment and income while providing socio-economic benefits for present and future generations. It should encompass the restoration, protection and sustenance of diverse, productive and intrinsic values of the marine and coastal ecosystem. This model should be based primarily on cleaner technologies, renewable energy resources and circular economy for securing economic and social stability by considering the capacity of the planet. Fisheries, shipping and ports, marine-based tourism, seabed mining and marine renewable energy are the main sectors in a blue economy framework.
A sustainable blue economy is basically a marine/ocean-based economy that contributes to food security, eradication of poverty, employment and income while providing socio-economic benefits for present and future generations.
Coastal economy includes activities related to employment, output and wages in the coastal ecosystem. Marine economy is the cluster of industries which includes the sectors that focuses on a common market for the final products, using similar technology or labour or similar natural resources. Marine economy can be considered as the subset of coastal economy. The concept of blue economy has multiple interpretations as it covers a variety of activities, locations and sectors.

Key Economic Benefits

The key economic issues addressed by the ‘blue economy’ concept are:
Food Security and Protein Demand: The fisheries sector encompassing aquaculture and plants is a source of considerable amount of proteins, calories and fats which promote food security in a country. Food security can be fully ensured only if the access to food is enhanced by lowering the barriers of trade, reducing food wastage, increasing the availability of nutritious food and providing efficient food distribution system in countries that suffer from deficit. For ensuring a healthy life, a balanced diet of proteins and fats should be supplied. Food basket should consist of a minimum amount of protein intake, and fish is an important source of animal protein. It benefits countries even if they have a lower daily average consumption.Rising Coastal Tourism: A major sector of blue economy is coastal tourism with immense potential for employment and growth in the economy. Developing a focused policy addressing the potential and constraints of the tourism industry can yield concrete results. Scuba diving, bird watching, sea angling, boating, and other segments like hotels, restaurants, water sports have potential for huge investments and can contribute to a robust blue economy in the country.Seaborne Trade: Sea is considered as a cost-effective carbon friendly mode of transportation used widely around the world. 90 % of global trade is done through sea routes. In the blue economy framework, priorities and policies should be towards promoting trade especially through sea routes by making it more systematic and futuristic.Alternative Sources for Energy: If large renewable energy remains untapped in a country, blue economy can be a major source of clean energy. The demand for clean and affordable energy is increasing across the world. Blue economy can be a great source of clean and affordable energy. The Oceans are huge resources for renewable energy, like wave energy, tidal energy, solar energy etc. Exploitation of the oceans can reduce the pressure on finite traditional energy resources.

India’s Blue Economy Potential

Blue economy in India can be considered as the total sum of all economic activities that are based and sourced from marine and coastal resources. Deep sea mining, Offshore oil, fisheries contribute majorly towards the country’s blue economy. India has a coastline of about 8118kms and exclusive economic zones that cover almost 2 million sq kms including a continental shelf of 530000 kms. Almost 1.5 million kms of this continental shelf has been explored in the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea. Majority of India’s population are based in coastal metro cities like Chennai, Mumbai and Kolkata. More than a million people are employed in full time coastal fishing activities while more than 1.3 million people are employed in post-harvest fisheries and allied activities. India contributes to more than 10 % of world’s fish varieties. The country ranks second in worldwide fish production with a growth rate of 7 % annually and ranks second in aquaculture activities as well. The Malabar coast, Konkan belt and other coastal areas have shown considerable increase in influx of tourists over the years. Polymetallic nodules and sulphides are two of the major mineral resources that are commercially available in India. India is also an offshore gas giant and the country is trying to substitute terrestrial sources of energy with offshore reserves and renewable sources in the future. The Sagarmala project is considered as a pioneering initiative by the government to steer the country into the path of blue economy. The project was in initiated in 2015, costing around 8700 billion rupees and is proposed to be implemented over 20 years.The Sagarmala project is considered as a pioneering initiative by the government to steer the country into the path of blue economy.To create a sustainable blue economy, significant investments in research and development need to be carried out in accordance with planning and execution of a detailed region-specific blue economy model. Goals for different economic, social and ecological segments as well as respective policies should be integrated in the framework. Governments, social and private organizations and communities should collaborate and contribute to the framework by assigning achievable goals. These goals should be assessed and reported with all the members in the framework so that performance is consistently monitored. Economic instruments like taxes, subsidies, tariff and quotas can be used to internalize the benefits which are both economic and environmental. International, laws, treaties and agreements can help to implement a global blue economy system and network to ease trade and flow of labour. By linking terrestrial economy with marine economy, a sustainable green economy on land can also be developed. Each country should develop its own blue economy framework by recognizing its potential to contribute to and strengthen a sustainable and eco-friendly global economy.

References

Asher, M., 2018. India’s Blue Economy Initiatives: Establishing New Growth Nodes and Helping to Address Regional Imbalances.
Benzaken, D., 2017. Blue Economy in The Indian Ocean Region: Status And Opportunities. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
Economist Intelligence Unit, 2015. The Blue Economy: Growth, Opportunity And A Sustainable Ocean Economy. Events World Ocean Summit. Economist Intelligence Unit.
Llewellyn, L., English, S. and Barnwell, S., 2016. A roadmap to a sustainable Indian Ocean blue economy. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 12(1), pp.52-66.
Mohanty, S., Dash, P., Gupta, A. and Gaur, P., 2015. Prospects Of Blue Economy In The Indian Ocean. Research and Information System for Developing Countries.
Roy, A. (2019, January 11). Blue Economy in the Indian Ocean: Governance Perspectives for sustainable development in the region. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/research/blue-economy-in-the-indian-ocean-governance-perspectives-for-sustainable-development-in-the-region-47449Image Credit: Adobe Stock

July 21, 2020